data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f7ce/1f7ce8974084e37b89a33215b276c34ba6ccb3ed" alt="immunoperoxidase stain in breast histology"
Diagnosing cancerous cells have been a nightmare for pathologists. We can not define a normal cell properly and differentiating them with cancerous cells can be pretty tough. Apart from their detection by radiological investigations which include X-rays, CT scan, MRI and other imaging modalities; we depend heavily on tissue biopsy samples collected from the patient's suspected specimen. We then stain the specimen using various dyes and examine them under the microscope.
For example, in the above picture, a section of breast tissue has been stained with immunoperoxidase. Such staining employs targeting and latching onto a tissue antigen of interest by using an external antibody (the immuno part), and then making these tissue antigens visible by the formation of a colored product by catalytic reactions brought about by peroxidase.
Now scientists have gone one step further. In some cancers of the breast there is an overexpression of a protein (antigen) called HER2/neu (Erb B2). This is a transmembrane protein, meaning that this molecule has an extracellular domain, a membrane spanning portion and an intracellular part. The peculiar nomenclature derives from the fact that this molecule is in fact a receptor for human epidermal growth factor and was found in rat neuroblastoma cell lines. Surprisingly, HER does not seem to have a physiological ligand, making the receptor look like a lady who does not have a mate!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd177/fd17782fb18100bc59472803481fd2a0486c24c6" alt="tyrosine kinase activation and downstream effects"
Scientists are now tagging magnetic nanoparticles with antibody to HER2/neu. Trastuzumab (herceptin), as the antibody is known, is a humanized monoclonal antibody (only one type/clone of molecule). Thus magnetic nanoparticles attaches to HER proteins (via trastuzumab); the density (intensity) of which can then be probed by applying the specimen to a magnetic field and extrapolating the the distortion these nanoparticles induce in them. Researchers at University College London (UCL) in the UK have developed HistoMag system which uses this technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/381c8/381c8c252771a030fc249c0d1c444495cf2c7d9c" alt="HistoMag with its coils, for cancer detection using SQUID"
In another development, researchers at the University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary and Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany, have used paramagnetic microspheres coated with ligands (Herceptin) to attach to HER2. They then used confocal laser microscopy and digital image processing to 'see' the trans-activation (of ErbB2 (HER-2)). In confocal laser microscopy, a laser light is thrown into the sample through a special dichroic mirror, which allows light of one (long) wavelength to pass and that of other (short) wavelengths to reflect. When a laser of blue color (say) strikes the sample, which has been treated with a fluorescent dye, light of another wavelength say green is emitted. The dichromatic mirror now filters the blue light, while letting the green light pass, which is then amplified by photomultiplier tube and visualized. They found this to be an efficient tool in assessing Erb (HER2) activation, signal propagation and heterodimer formation.
In vivo neoplasms may be imaged by administering the patient a dose of these nanomagnets by mouth or by injection, and then imaging the patient. A modification of the device will be necessary.
Friedländer, E., Arndt-Jovin, D.J., Nagy, P., Jovin, T.M., Szöllősi, J., Vereb, G. (2005). Signal transduction of erbB receptors in trastuzumab (Herceptin) sensitive and resistant cell lines: Local stimulation using magnetic microspheres as assessed by quantitative digital microscopy. Cytometry Part A, 67A(2), 161-171. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20173
Last modified: never
Reference: hyper-links, unless otherwise mentioned
2 comments:
Can you please comment on the possibility/effectiveness of MRI use in the early breast cancer detection?
Newer generations of MRI is better in detecting "early breast cancer" than their former counterparts. However, due to its high "sensitivity", false positive cases may be reported, leading to more/unwanted treatment.
Please read more at the American Cancer Society:http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/NWS_1_1x_MRI_May_Alter_Treatment_For_Early_Stage_Breast_Cancer.asp
Post a Comment